First Overseas Investments Corp. v. Dantas
509 So. 2d 987, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1719, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 1987·No. No. 87-1326·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court struck the defendant’s pleadings because of substantial violations of the discovery rules and a court order enforcing them. Our review of the record reveals no abuse of discretion. See McMillian v. State of Florida, Department of [988] Corrections, 506 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and cases cited.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
First Overseas Investments Corp. v. Dantas, 509 So. 2d 987, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1719, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9343 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).
509 So. 2d 987 (First Overseas Investments Corp. v. Dantas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kranz v. Levan
602 So. 2d 668 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)