Home/Connecticut Superior Court/First Nat'l Bank v. Blakeslee

First Nat'l Bank v. Blakeslee

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 354
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1936
DocketFile No. 50704
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 354 (First Nat'l Bank v. Blakeslee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First Nat'l Bank v. Blakeslee, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 354 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

This motion, read in the light of the supporting argument, is so obvious an attempt on the part of the plaintiff to draw the answer as well as the complaint, that further comment is unnecessary. A party still has the right to plead his case in his own way unless he runs counter to some rule of pleading. Freeman's Appeal, 71 Conn. 708. No such offense appearing here, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Dwyer v. Housatonic Area Reg. Transit, Inc., No. 32 28 61 (Dec. 3, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7410 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Conn. Super. Ct. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-natl-bank-v-blakeslee-connsuperct-1936.