First Nat'l Bank v. Blakeslee

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 354
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided December 15, 1936·No. File No. 50704·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This motion, read in the light of the supporting argument, is so obvious an attempt on the part of the plaintiff to draw the answer as well as the complaint, that further comment is unnecessary. A party still has the right to plead his case in his own way unless he runs counter to some rule of pleading. Freeman's Appeal, 71 Conn. 708. No such offense appearing here, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First Nat'l Bank v. Blakeslee, 4 Conn. Super. Ct. 354 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

4 Conn. Super. Ct. 354 (First Nat'l Bank v. Blakeslee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Dwyer v. Housatonic Area Reg. Transit, Inc., No. 32 28 61 (Dec. 3, 1996)
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7410 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1996)