First Natl. Bank of Longview v. St. Banking Bd.

11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 90, 1928 Tex. LEXIS 110
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 1928
DocketNo. 4876.
StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.W.2d 505 (First Natl. Bank of Longview v. St. Banking Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First Natl. Bank of Longview v. St. Banking Bd., 11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 90, 1928 Tex. LEXIS 110 (Tex. 1928).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The Supreme Court has this day adopted the opinion of Section B of the Commission, in the case of Edwin Lacey, et al. v. State Banking Board. The holdings in that opinion require the same disposition of this case that is made of that case.

We recommend that the mandamus sought herein be refused.

Opinion of the Commission of Appeals adopted, and mandamus refused.

Thomas B. Greenwood, Associate Justice.

William Pierson, Associate Justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.W.2d 505, 118 Tex. 90, 1928 Tex. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-natl-bank-of-longview-v-st-banking-bd-tex-1928.