First National City Bank of New York v. Latona
This text of 260 F.2d 264 (First National City Bank of New York v. Latona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are constrained to agree with the referee’s persuasive memorandum of decision, confirmed by the court below, that the bankrupt’s failure to disclose at least one if not both of two prior loans when procuring a further loan from the objecting creditor here rendered the financial statement he submitted materially false and requires denial of the discharge in bankruptcy he seeks. None of his various objections to the referee’s rulings on evidence are well taken.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 F.2d 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-city-bank-of-new-york-v-latona-ca2-1958.