First National City Bank of New York v. Latona

260 F.2d 264
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 29, 1958
DocketNo. 15, Docket 24705
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 F.2d 264 (First National City Bank of New York v. Latona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National City Bank of New York v. Latona, 260 F.2d 264 (2d Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are constrained to agree with the referee’s persuasive memorandum of decision, confirmed by the court below, that the bankrupt’s failure to disclose at least one if not both of two prior loans when procuring a further loan from the objecting creditor here rendered the financial statement he submitted materially false and requires denial of the discharge in bankruptcy he seeks. None of his various objections to the referee’s rulings on evidence are well taken.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 F.2d 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-city-bank-of-new-york-v-latona-ca2-1958.