First National Bk. of High Bridge, New Jersey v. . Hudson

118 N.E. 506, 222 N.Y. 556, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 878
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 11, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 118 N.E. 506 (First National Bk. of High Bridge, New Jersey v. . Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bk. of High Bridge, New Jersey v. . Hudson, 118 N.E. 506, 222 N.Y. 556, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 878 (N.Y. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division must be affirmed, except as to one item.

There is evidence upon which it would be possible for a jury to find that the plaintiff's cashier, Beavers, purchased through the defendants one hundred shares of the stock of the Pressed Steel Car Company. The certificates were in the name of Goodhart & Company, and were indorsed in blank.

On May 5th, 1911, one Rufe discounted a collateral *557 note with the plaintiff for $4,500. The proceeds were placed to Beaver’s credit. The collateral were changed from time to time. The certificates in question were delivered to Beavers on September 4th, 1912. He erased from the note the description of the collaterals then held as security for its payment, wrote in their place 100 Pressed St. Car ” and placed the certificates in the plaintiff’s pouch with the Rufe note as collateral thereto.

It would be possible for the jury further to find that on October 24th Beavers, without the consent of the plaintiff, took from the pouch these same certificates and returned them to the defendants.

Later, on March 17th, 1913, the defendants sold them and received $2,573 therefor.

If the jury should find these facts the plaintiff would be entitled to judgment against the defendants for that amount and interest.

The judgment appealed from should be, therefore, modified so as to read and provide: “ Judgment reversed and complaint dismissed, except as to the item of $2,573 value of the Pressed Steel Car Company stock and as to which item á new trial is granted,” and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur; McLaughlin, J., not sitting.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watson v. City of Albuquerque
417 P.2d 54 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1966)
Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Hudson River Trust Co.
250 A.D. 159 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
State Bank v. Bache
162 Misc. 128 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 N.E. 506, 222 N.Y. 556, 1917 N.Y. LEXIS 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bk-of-high-bridge-new-jersey-v-hudson-ny-1917.