First National Bank v. Stone

Supreme Court of Florida

First National Bank v. Stone

137 So. 799, 103 Fla. 691

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 24, 1931·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

*692 Buford, O.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby affirmed.

*692 Buford, O.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J. J., concur.

First National Bank v. Stone, 137 So. 799, 103 Fla. 691 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

137 So. 799 (First National Bank v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.