First National Bank v. Stetson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

First National Bank v. Stetson

200 N.W. 356, 160 Minn. 533, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 799

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 24, 1924

DocketNo. 24,257

StatusPublished

This text of 200 N.W. 356 (First National Bank v. Stetson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Stetson, 200 N.W. 356, 160 Minn. 533, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 799 (Mich. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover a balance of the premium on four insurance policies, in amounts as follows: Upon one policy $27.59; one $22; one $52.30 and one $93.70, a total of $195.59, with interest from May 3, 1923, at 6 per cent per annum.

It is admitted in the answer that defendants were copartners, as alleged in the complaint; that they ordered certain fire insurance from and through the plaintiff: and became indebted to plaintiff for premiums thereon, but it is alleged that payment had been made prior to the commencement of this action. Plaintiff offered proof that there was a balance of $195.59 owing thereon. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant’s testimony does not appear in the record, nor does the charge of the court appear therein. The verdict must be sustained.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover a balance of the premium on four insurance policies, in amounts as follows: Upon one policy $27.59; one $22; one $52.30 and one $93.70, a total of $195.59, with interest from May 3, 1923, at 6 per cent per annum.

It is admitted in the answer that defendants were copartners, as alleged in the complaint; that they ordered certain fire insurance from and through the plaintiff: and became indebted to plaintiff for premiums thereon, but it is alleged that payment had been made prior to the commencement of this action. Plaintiff offered proof that there was a balance of $195.59 owing thereon. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. Defendant’s testimony does not appear in the record, nor does the charge of the court appear therein. The verdict must be sustained.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 N.W. 356, 160 Minn. 533, 1924 Minn. LEXIS 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-stetson-minn-1924.