First National Bank v. Rogers

48 A. 686, 198 Pa. 627, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 851
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 1, 1901
DocketAppeal, No. 75
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 48 A. 686 (First National Bank v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank v. Rogers, 48 A. 686, 198 Pa. 627, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 851 (Pa. 1901).

Opinion

Pee Otteiam,

A careful perusal of all the testimony in the case shows that ■ the question of fact involved was for the determination of the jury. No error appears in the charge of the court, and the opinion refusing the motion for a new trial furnishes a complete and satisfactory answer to the appellant’s contention. As none of the numerous assignments of error would warrant a reversal of the judgment, they are all dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank of Pittsburgh v. Dowling
133 A. 793 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Roger v. Milliken
4 Pelt. 368 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1921)
Maurepas Milling Co. v. Opdenweyer - George Lumber Co.
2 Pelt. 112 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A. 686, 198 Pa. 627, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-rogers-pa-1901.