First National Bank v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

First National Bank v. Rogers

48 A. 686, 198 Pa. 627, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 851

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 1, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 75·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Pee Otteiam,

A careful perusal of all the testimony in the case shows that ■ the question of fact involved was for the determination of the jury. No error appears in the charge of the court, and the opinion refusing the motion for a new trial furnishes a complete and satisfactory answer to the appellant’s contention. As none of the numerous assignments of error would warrant a reversal of the judgment, they are all dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Otteiam,

A careful perusal of all the testimony in the case shows that ■ the question of fact involved was for the determination of the jury. No error appears in the charge of the court, and the opinion refusing the motion for a new trial furnishes a complete and satisfactory answer to the appellant’s contention. As none of the numerous assignments of error would warrant a reversal of the judgment, they are all dismissed.

Judgment affirmed.

First National Bank v. Rogers, 48 A. 686, 198 Pa. 627, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 851 (Pa. 1901).

Pincite

48 A. 686 (First National Bank v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related