First National Bank v. Rogers
This text of 48 A. 686 (First National Bank v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A careful perusal of all the testimony in the case shows that ■ the question of fact involved was for the determination of the jury. No error appears in the charge of the court, and the opinion refusing the motion for a new trial furnishes a complete and satisfactory answer to the appellant’s contention. As none of the numerous assignments of error would warrant a reversal of the judgment, they are all dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A. 686, 198 Pa. 627, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-rogers-pa-1901.