First National Bank v. Perry

Supreme Court of Iowa

First National Bank v. Perry

29 Iowa 266

Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided June 15, 1870·Published

Opinion

Williams, J.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Curtis v. Raymond Bros. & Co., ante, 52. The majority of the court desire that it be noted that they do not think this conflicts with the reasoning in Torbert v. Hayden, 11 Iowa, 435.

In this opinion I do not concur The rule in the case at bar does not conflict with the rule established in Torbert v. Hayden, but it does with dicta contained in that opinion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams, J.

The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Curtis v. Raymond Bros. & Co., ante, 52. The majority of the court desire that it be noted that they do not think this conflicts with the reasoning in Torbert v. Hayden, 11 Iowa, 435.

In this opinion I do not concur The rule in the case at bar does not conflict with the rule established in Torbert v. Hayden, but it does with dicta contained in that opinion.

Affirmed.

First National Bank v. Perry, 29 Iowa 266 (iowa 1870).

Pincite

29 Iowa 266 (First National Bank v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related