First National Bank v. Peisert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

First National Bank v. Peisert

2 Pennyp. 277

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 27, 1882

DocketNo. 27

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Pennyp. 277 (First National Bank v. Peisert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Peisert, 2 Pennyp. 277 (Pa. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

That the president of the bank knew that the moneys deposited by the plaintiff were the funds of the assigned estate of Miller, was a fact of which there was ample evidence, and it was fairly submitted to the jury. This knowledge he acquired in the course of the business of the bank. That from such knowledge the bank is affected with notice is very clearly settled in Harrisburg v. Tyler, 3 W. & S., 373, and other cases.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam:

That the president of the bank knew that the moneys deposited by the plaintiff were the funds of the assigned estate of Miller, was a fact of which there was ample evidence, and it was fairly submitted to the jury. This knowledge he acquired in the course of the business of the bank. That from such knowledge the bank is affected with notice is very clearly settled in Harrisburg v. Tyler, 3 W. & S., 373, and other cases.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Pennyp. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-peisert-pa-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack