First National Bank v. Northwestern Elevator Co.

50 N.W. 356, 2 S.D. 356, 1891 S.D. LEXIS 37
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 30, 1891
StatusPublished

This text of 50 N.W. 356 (First National Bank v. Northwestern Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank v. Northwestern Elevator Co., 50 N.W. 356, 2 S.D. 356, 1891 S.D. LEXIS 37 (S.D. 1891).

Opinion

• Per Curiam.

Respondent moves to dismiss appeal be[357]*357cause the abstract does not show that any notice of appeal has been served as required by law, and because no bill of exceptions has been served or settled. The motion must be granted upon the first ground. Until the record which presents the case for review shows that we have jurisdiction, we can do nothing but decline to examine it. The same question was presented in Irrigation Co. v. Schone, 50 N. W. Rep. 356, (decided at this term,) where the views of the court are more fully expressed. The appeal is dismissed.

All the judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valley City Land & Irrigation Co. v. Schone
50 N.W. 356 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 N.W. 356, 2 S.D. 356, 1891 S.D. LEXIS 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-northwestern-elevator-co-sd-1891.