First National Bank v. Lueker

First Circuit

First National Bank v. Lueker

89 F.3d 849

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJune 4, 1996

Docket95-2075

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 89 F.3d 849 (First National Bank v. Lueker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Lueker, 89 F.3d 849 (1st Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

89 F.3d 849

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK, of Boston (Guernsey) Limited,
Plaintiff--Counter-Defendant-Appellant.
and
SUNWEST BANK OF ALBUQUERQUE, N.A.,
Defendant--Counter-claimant, Third-Party Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Richard D. LUEKER, N. Joan Lueker, A. Rolfe Black, Dorothy
W. Black, Roy W. Bidwell, Eileen Bidwell, Vaun T.
Floyd, Norman C. Barnhart, Third-Party
Defendants,
Counter-claimants--Appellees.

No. 95-2075.
D.C. No. CIV-94-231-JC.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 4, 1996.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, McKAY, and JONES,** Circuit Judges.

We AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

**

The Honorable Nathaniel R. Jones, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

89 F.3d 849

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK, of Boston (Guernsey) Limited,
Plaintiff--Counter-Defendant-Appellant.
and
SUNWEST BANK OF ALBUQUERQUE, N.A.,
Defendant--Counter-claimant, Third-Party Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Richard D. LUEKER, N. Joan Lueker, A. Rolfe Black, Dorothy
W. Black, Roy W. Bidwell, Eileen Bidwell, Vaun T.
Floyd, Norman C. Barnhart, Third-Party
Defendants,
Counter-claimants--Appellees.

No. 95-2075.
D.C. No. CIV-94-231-JC.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 4, 1996.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before TACHA, McKAY, and JONES,** Circuit Judges.

We AFFIRM for substantially the reasons given by the district court.

*

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3

**

The Honorable Nathaniel R. Jones, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F.3d 849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-lueker-ca1-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack