First National Bank v. Lock Stitch Fence Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

First National Bank v. Lock Stitch Fence Co.

1 Ga. L. Rep. 25

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 25 (First National Bank v. Lock Stitch Fence Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Lock Stitch Fence Co., 1 Ga. L. Rep. 25 (Ga. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

If a third person puts his name in blank on the back of a promis-sory note at the time it is made and before it is endorsed by the payee, to give the maker credit with the payee he must be considered as a joint maker. As the question is one of general commercial law the Federal court i§ not bound by the course of the judicial decision upon it, even, in the State where the note was executed and made payable. — Chicago - Leg. N. June 13, 1885.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

If a third person puts his name in blank on the back of a promis-sory note at the time it is made and before it is endorsed by the payee, to give the maker credit with the payee he must be considered as a joint maker. As the question is one of general commercial law the Federal court i§ not bound by the course of the judicial decision upon it, even, in the State where the note was executed and made payable. — Chicago - Leg. N. June 13, 1885.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ga. L. Rep. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-lock-stitch-fence-co-ga-1885.