First National Bank v. Kest

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

First National Bank v. Kest

257 A.D. 824, 11 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8042

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 824 (First National Bank v. Kest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Kest, 257 A.D. 824, 11 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8042 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Action on a promissory note. Order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The defense of conditional delivery is not available to the appellants. (Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Bergoff, 272 N. Y. 192; Rothschild v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 279 id. 355; Westchester Trust Co. v. Harrison, 249 App. Div. 828; Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Oakwood Gardens, Inc., 254 id. 686.) Alleging the tender of collateral when demand for payment is made is not necessary to charge an endorser on a note when demand of payment from the maker is expressly waivdd by the endorser. (First National Bank v. Wood, 71 N. Y. 405; Neg. Inst. Law, § 144.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action on a promissory note. Order granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The defense of conditional delivery is not available to the appellants. (Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Bergoff, 272 N. Y. 192; Rothschild v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 279 id. 355; Westchester Trust Co. v. Harrison, 249 App. Div. 828; Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Oakwood Gardens, Inc., 254 id. 686.) Alleging the tender of collateral when demand for payment is made is not necessary to charge an endorser on a note when demand of payment from the maker is expressly waivdd by the endorser. (First National Bank v. Wood, 71 N. Y. 405; Neg. Inst. Law, § 144.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 824, 11 N.Y.S.2d 965, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-kest-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack