First National Bank v. Kehnast

Supreme Court

First National Bank v. Kehnast

241 U.S. 654, 36 S. Ct. 724, 60 L. Ed. 1223, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1390

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 22, 1916

DocketNo. 333

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 241 U.S. 654 (First National Bank v. Kehnast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Kehnast, 241 U.S. 654, 36 S. Ct. 724, 60 L. Ed. 1223, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1390 (1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Chemical National Bank v. City Bank of Portage, 160 U. S. 646; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134. (2) Leather Manufacturers’ Bank v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 778, 781; Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank, 134 U. S. 527; Petri v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago, 142 U. S. 644; Hermann v. Edwards, 238 U. S. 107.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Chemical National Bank v. City Bank of Portage, 160 U. S. 646; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Mellon v. McCafferty, 239 U. S. 134. (2) Leather Manufacturers’ Bank v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 778, 781; Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank, 134 U. S. 527; Petri v. Commercial National Bank of Chicago, 142 U. S. 644; Hermann v. Edwards, 238 U. S. 107.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 U.S. 654, 36 S. Ct. 724, 60 L. Ed. 1223, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-kehnast-scotus-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack