First National Bank v. Jones
This text of 76 S.E. 1042 (First National Bank v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. This court has no power to decide questions which were not raised in the lower court; and, .consequently, the objections to the pleadings must be treated as having been waived. Ward v. Frick Company, 95 Ga. 804 (22 S. E. 899).
2. The note in the present case showing upon its face that it was given for a patent right, the defendants were, as against the holder of the note, let into all of their defenses against the original payee. The evidence authorized a finding in their favor, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 S.E. 1042, 12 Ga. App. 158, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-jones-gactapp-1913.