First National Bank v. Houseknecht

80 N.W. 13, 121 Mich. 313, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 571
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 19, 1899
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 N.W. 13 (First National Bank v. Houseknecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank v. Houseknecht, 80 N.W. 13, 121 Mich. 313, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 571 (Mich. 1899).

Opinion

Grant, C. J.

(after stating the facts). The theories of the defense were fully and fairly submitted to the jury by the court. The principles of law involved are familiar to the profession, and it would be idle to reiterate them here. The verdict of the jury disposed of all the questions of fact, and they found either that there were no fraudulent representations, or that, if any were made, plaintiff had no notice thereof before parting with value, and that plaintiff took the note in payment of the balance due upon the check before it had notice of any taint.

Judgment affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maxwell v. Missouri Valley Ice & Cold Storage Co.
181 Iowa 108 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.W. 13, 121 Mich. 313, 1899 Mich. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-houseknecht-mich-1899.