First National Bank v. Hodapp

Supreme Court of Minnesota

First National Bank v. Hodapp

107 N.W. 957, 98 Minn. 534, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 634

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 8, 1906

DocketNos. 14,802-(97)

StatusPublished

This text of 107 N.W. 957 (First National Bank v. Hodapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Hodapp, 107 N.W. 957, 98 Minn. 534, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 634 (Mich. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to determine adverse claims to real estate and involves the validity of a tax judgment and sale of the land for local improvements pursuant to the provisions of the charter of the city of Mankato. All of the errors [535]*535assigned in this case and urged in the brief of counsel were disposed of adversely to the appellants in the case of Willard v. Hodapp, supra, page 269.

Counsel for appellant urged on the oral argument certain objections to the tax judgment and deeds which are not considered in the opinion in the case here referred to, but such objections were neither assigned as error nor urged in the brief of counsel. Wb do not consider them.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an action to determine adverse claims to real estate and involves the validity of a tax judgment and sale of the land for local improvements pursuant to the provisions of the charter of the city of Mankato. All of the errors [535]*535assigned in this case and urged in the brief of counsel were disposed of adversely to the appellants in the case of Willard v. Hodapp, supra, page 269.

Counsel for appellant urged on the oral argument certain objections to the tax judgment and deeds which are not considered in the opinion in the case here referred to, but such objections were neither assigned as error nor urged in the brief of counsel. Wb do not consider them.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 N.W. 957, 98 Minn. 534, 1906 Minn. LEXIS 634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-hodapp-minn-1906.