First National Bank v. Guyton

72 So. 460, 72 Fla. 43
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 72 So. 460 (First National Bank v. Guyton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank v. Guyton, 72 So. 460, 72 Fla. 43 (Fla. 1916).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

When a note secured by mortgage is transferred the mortgage follows the note as an incident thereto and the transferrer of the note ordinarily has no more right or authority to release the mortgage than he has to cancel the note after the note is transferred. See Scott v. Taylor, 63 Fla. 612, 58 South. Rep. 30; Taylor v. American National Bank of Pensacola, Fla., 63 Fla. 631, 57 South. Rep. 678; Northrup v. Reese, 68 Fla. 451, 67 South. Rep. 136.

In securing or accepting a release of a portion of a prior mortgage in their favor the second mortgagees should ascertain the authority of the original prior mortgagee to make the release, since if the notes which the mortgage secured had passed to another the mortgage rights had also passed as an incident to the debt and an effective release of the mortgage could not be made by the original mortgagee. Carter had no authority to release the mortgage after he had transferred the notes, and his release does not affect the rights of the holders of the notes secured by the mortgage to priority over second mortgagees. Chapter 6909, Acts of 1915, was enacted subsequent to the decree appealed from herein.

The decree is reversed.

[45]*45Taylor, C. J., and Shackleford, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Cockrell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Onewest Bank v. Palmero
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
HSBC Bank USA v. Buset
241 So. 3d 882 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
The Inn at South Palm Beach, Inc. v. Jacobs
155 So. 835 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Florida Trust & Banking Co. v. Hancock
136 So. 324 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Holmes v. Dunning
133 So. 557 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Drake Lumber Co. v. Semple
130 So. 577 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Harris v. Robertson
81 So. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Lonergan v. Peebles
81 So. 514 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Forman v. First National Bank
79 So. 742 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 So. 460, 72 Fla. 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-guyton-fla-1916.