First National Bank v. Fugier
This text of 116 P. 512 (First National Bank v. Fugier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Execution of the note in suit was duly proved and delivery was proved prima facie by production of the note. The evidence does not show, as the appellant claims, that the bank knew the note was not to be paid until the land deal was closed. The court finds nothing in the evidence which would put the bank on inquiry or which shows bad faith on its part. In fact, the evidence shows a purchase in good faith. -The testimony is that the note has not been paid, but that the money deposited by the indorsers was merely for the purpose of security.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
116 P. 512, 85 Kan. 877, 1911 Kan. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-fugier-kan-1911.