First National Bank v. Fairchester Oil Co.
This text of 293 N.Y. 749 (First National Bank v. Fairchester Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur (see 292 N. Y. 694) to show “ that this Court determined in the affirmative the question whether paragraph 10 of the contract of lease must be construed as excluding from its scope regulations under the Second War Powers. Act by the War Production Board and the office of Price Administration of .the United States Government.”
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements on the ground that the proposed question is not one of Federal cognizance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 N.Y. 749, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-fairchester-oil-co-ny-1944.