First National Bank v. Fairchester Oil Co.
293 N.Y. 749
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur (see 292 N. Y. 694) to show “ that this Court determined in the affirmative the question whether paragraph 10 of the contract of lease must be construed as excluding from its scope regulations under the Second War Powers. Act by the War Production Board and the office of Price Administration of .the United States Government.”
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements on the ground that the proposed question is not one of Federal cognizance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
First National Bank v. Fairchester Oil Co., 293 N.Y. 749 (N.Y. 1944).
293 N.Y. 749 (First National Bank v. Fairchester Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
First N. Bk New Rochelle v. Fairchester Oil
56 N.E.2d 111 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)