First National Bank v. Eaton

New York Supreme Court

First National Bank v. Eaton

92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106

DecidedFebruary 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106 (First National Bank v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Eaton, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Hardin, P. J.:

As the appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer to a part of defendants’ answer, and no appeal is taken from any interlocutory judgment, the appeal should be dismissed. (Code, § 1349; Cambridge Valley Nat. Bank v. Lynch, 16 N. Y. 514; Sheffield, v. Robinson, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 163; S. C., sub nom. Sheffield v. Mur[107]*107ray, 80 Hun, 555; Lee v. Timkin, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 764; S. C., 81 Hun, 81; Haffey v. Lynch, 68 id. 506.)

Tbe appeal should be dismissed.

Martin and Merwin, JJ., concurred.

Appeal dismissed, without costs. (See 68 Hun, 506.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI