First National Bank v. Eaton
92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106
Opinion
As the appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer to a part of defendants’ answer, and no appeal is taken from any interlocutory judgment, the appeal should be dismissed. (Code, § 1349; Cambridge Valley Nat. Bank v. Lynch, 16 N. Y. 514; Sheffield, v. Robinson, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 163; S. C., sub nom. Sheffield v. Mur[107] ray, 80 Hun, 555; Lee v. Timkin, 62 N. Y. St. Repr. 764; S. C., 81 Hun, 81; Haffey v. Lynch, 68 id. 506.)
Tbe appeal should be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed, without costs. (See 68 Hun, 506.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
First National Bank v. Eaton, 92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).
92 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 106 (First National Bank v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ridgway v. Bacon
22 N.Y.S. 1016 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Lee v. Timken
30 N.Y.S. 800 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)