First National Bank v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

First National Bank v. Commissioner

11 B.T.A. 671

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedApril 18, 1928

DocketDocket No. 7570

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 11 B.T.A. 671 (First National Bank v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank v. Commissioner, 11 B.T.A. 671 (bta 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

[673]*673OPINION.

Murdock:

Section 234 (a) (5) of the Revenue Act of 1921 provides for the deduction of—

Debts ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the' taxable year * * *.

The language of the Act i,s unambiguous and unmistakably requires compliance with both conditions before a deduction may be allowed for the purpose of computing net income subject to taxation. Mason Machine Works Co., 3 B. T. A. 745.

In the present case we are not convinced that the petitioner, in the year 1921, ascertained any one of these debts to be worthless. There was only one witness called by the petitioner. He was the cashier. He stated that in 1921, he considered the notes to be worthless, but that the president controlled the affairs of the bank and would not allow the charge-off in 1921. It was not until February 7, 1922, that the petitioner determined to charge off the notes as worthless and made the charge-off on its books. While in some circumstances a charge-off on February 7th might be allowed as of the end of the preceding year, in this case it does not appear that the charge-off was intended to be made as of the end of 1921, to close the books for that year.

Judgment will he entered for the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[673]*673OPINION.

Murdock:

Section 234 (a) (5) of the Revenue Act of 1921 provides for the deduction of—

Debts ascertained to be worthless and charged off within the' taxable year * * *.

The language of the Act i,s unambiguous and unmistakably requires compliance with both conditions before a deduction may be allowed for the purpose of computing net income subject to taxation. Mason Machine Works Co., 3 B. T. A. 745.

In the present case we are not convinced that the petitioner, in the year 1921, ascertained any one of these debts to be worthless. There was only one witness called by the petitioner. He was the cashier. He stated that in 1921, he considered the notes to be worthless, but that the president controlled the affairs of the bank and would not allow the charge-off in 1921. It was not until February 7, 1922, that the petitioner determined to charge off the notes as worthless and made the charge-off on its books. While in some circumstances a charge-off on February 7th might be allowed as of the end of the preceding year, in this case it does not appear that the charge-off was intended to be made as of the end of 1921, to close the books for that year.

Judgment will he entered for the respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 B.T.A. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-commissioner-bta-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack