First National Bank v. Buchan

78 N.W. 878, 76 Minn. 54, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 535
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 21, 1899·No. Nos. 11,505—(49)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COLLINS, J.

Appeal from an order vacating and setting aside a writ of attachment and a levy thereunder, which writ was issued upon an affidavit in which it was averred that defendant had assigned, secreted and disposed of a portion of his property, and was about to assign, secrete and dispose of the balance thereof, with intent to delay and defraud his creditors. An examination of the affidavits used upon the hearing of the motion to vacate discloses a conflict of evidence as between the parties, and in such a case the determination of the court below is conclusive, unless there is a clear preponderance of evidence opposed to that determination. Finance Co. v. Hursey, 60 Minn. 17, 61 N. W. 672. Surely, the preponderance here was not in plaintiff’s favor.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First National Bank v. Buchan, 78 N.W. 878, 76 Minn. 54, 1899 Minn. LEXIS 535 (Mich. 1899).

78 N.W. 878 (First National Bank v. Buchan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haugen v. Sundseth
118 N.W. 666 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1908)