First National Bank v. Brooks & Co.
This text of 82 S.E. 608 (First National Bank v. Brooks & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tlie only issue in this ease, so far as appears from the record, was whether or not the indorsements and assignments entered on the three draf.ts sued upon were so entered bona fide and before maturity. While the evidence upon this point apparently preponderates in behalf of the plaintiff, still there is some evidence to authorize the finding which the jury returned in favor of the defendants, and since, in the state of the record, the errors complained of were immaterial, the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be interfered with.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 S.E. 608, 15 Ga. App. 38, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-v-brooks-co-gactapp-1914.