First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bryan

427 So. 2d 392, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19148
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 9, 1983·No. No. 82-783·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HERSEY, Judge.

In garnishment proceedings the trial court required the garnishee bank to pay one-half of the fee of its own attorney for representation in the garnishment proceedings, as a cost of doing business; the other one-half of the fee was split between the garnishor and the defendant in garnishment. Allocation of that portion of the fee not required to be paid by the bank between the garnishor and the defendant in garnishment was appropriate in view of the fact that these parties entered into a settlement agreement, so that as between them there was no prevailing party. The bank, on the other hand, was merely a stakeholder and was entitled under the statute, Section 77.28, Florida Statutes (1981), to be reimbursed for the total amount expended as attorney’s fees. That amount was specifically found by the court to represent a reasonable fee.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a judgment in favor of the bank for the total amount of its attorney’s fees and costs.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bryan, 427 So. 2d 392, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19148 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

427 So. 2d 392 (First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zelaya/Capital International Judgment, LLC v. John Zelaya
769 F.3d 1296 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)
Ellis v. BARCLAYS BK. PLC-MIAMI AGENCY
594 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Scherer v. Scherer
591 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Ebsary Foundation Co. v. BARNETT BANK OF SOUTH FLA., NA
569 So. 2d 806 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)