First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Blakeslee
This text of 4 Conn. Supp. 354 (First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Blakeslee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This motion, read in the light of the supporting argument, is so obvious an attempt on the part of the plaintiff to draw the answer as well as the complaint, that further comment is unnecessary. A party still has the right to plead his case in his own way unless he runs counter to some rule of pleading. Freeman’s Appeal, 71 Conn., 708. No such offense appearing here, the motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Conn. Supp. 354, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-trust-co-v-blakeslee-connsuperct-1936.