First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Blakeslee

Connecticut Superior Court

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Blakeslee

4 Conn. Supp. 354, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 218

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Blakeslee. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 Conn. Super. Ct. 12 →

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided December 15, 1936·No. File #50704·Published

Opinion

JENNINGS, J.

This motion, read in the light of the supporting argument, is so obvious an attempt on the part of the plaintiff to draw the answer as well as the complaint, that further comment is unnecessary. A party still has the right to plead his case in his own way unless he runs counter to some rule of pleading. Freeman’s Appeal, 71 Conn., 708. No such offense appearing here, the motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JENNINGS, J.

This motion, read in the light of the supporting argument, is so obvious an attempt on the part of the plaintiff to draw the answer as well as the complaint, that further comment is unnecessary. A party still has the right to plead his case in his own way unless he runs counter to some rule of pleading. Freeman’s Appeal, 71 Conn., 708. No such offense appearing here, the motion is denied.

First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Blakeslee, 4 Conn. Supp. 354, 1936 Conn. Super. LEXIS 218 (Colo. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

4 Conn. Supp. 354 (First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Blakeslee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related