First National Bank of Wetumpka v. Sewell

N.D. Alabama

First National Bank of Wetumpka v. Sewell

79 B.R. 36, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19011

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama

DecidedFebruary 29, 1984

DocketCiv. A. No. 83-C-2426-E

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 79 B.R. 36 (First National Bank of Wetumpka v. Sewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank of Wetumpka v. Sewell, 79 B.R. 36, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19011 (N.D. Ala. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CLEMON, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in Southtrust Bank of Alabama v. Grady Lee Black, et al., CV No. 83-HM-2101-W [Available on WESTLAW, DCT database], it is hereby [37]*37ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED and DECLARED as follows:

1. Appellant FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WETUMPKA, ALABAMA, was not required to file a financing statement in order to perfect its purchase money security interest in the mobile home involved in this case.

2. The judgment appealed from is hereby REVERSED, with directions that the Bankruptcy Court shall henceforth recognize the security interest of First National Bank of Wetumpka in the 1974 Vagabond Mobile Home as a perfected security interest.

3. The costs of this action are hereby taxed against the defendant trustee, ED W. HARWELL, in his representative capacity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI