First National Bank of Richmond v. Commissioner

19 B.T.A. 288
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedMarch 17, 1930
DocketDocket No. 32385
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 B.T.A. 288 (First National Bank of Richmond v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank of Richmond v. Commissioner, 19 B.T.A. 288 (bta 1930).

Opinion

[294]*294OPINION.

McMahon:

The sole question in this proceeding is one of fact as to the value, for estate-tax purposes, of the 32½ per cent interest held by the decedent at the time of his death, May 14, 1924, in the partnerships of Pitts & Morris and Pitts & Morris Co.

In the estate-tax return this interest was included at a value of $51,585.13, which was the figure at which the interest of the decedent was carried on the books of the partnerships. The petitioner now contends that the fair value of the estate at the time of the death of decedent was not greater than $38,157.76. Petitioner contends that certain machinery and equipment which was included in the inventory of the estate at the book value of $73,858.97, was, in fact, worth not more than $32,500.

After a careful consideration of all the evidence presented to us we concluded and found, as a fact, that the value of the machinery and equipment at the time of the death of the decedent was not greater than $32,500, and that the value at that time of the 32½ per cent interest in the partnerships was not greater than $38,157.76. Upon the redetermination the interest of the decedent in the two partnerships will, therefore, be included at a value of $38,157.76.

Judgment will be entered under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner
19 B.T.A. 288 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 B.T.A. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-richmond-v-commissioner-bta-1930.