First National Bank of Racine v. Schellenberg
128 N.W. 279, 143 Wis. 647, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 329
This text of 128 N.W. 279 (First National Bank of Racine v. Schellenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
First National Bank of Racine v. Schellenberg, 128 N.W. 279, 143 Wis. 647, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 329 (Wis. 1910).
Opinion
The foregoing-brief statement of the contents of the complaint shows so clearly, by bare inspection* that the facts set forth constitute a good cause of action, it does not seem advisable to do more, in disposing of the appeal, than to state such conclusion and pronounce the proper judgment.
By the Court. — The order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Akwa
206 N.W.2d 174 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
128 N.W. 279, 143 Wis. 647, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-racine-v-schellenberg-wis-1910.