First National Bank of Racine v. Schellenberg
128 N.W. 279, 143 Wis. 647, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 329
Opinion
The foregoing-brief statement of the contents of the complaint shows so clearly, by bare inspection* that the facts set forth constitute a good cause of action, it does not seem advisable to do more, in disposing of the appeal, than to state such conclusion and pronounce the proper judgment.
By the Court. — The order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
First National Bank of Racine v. Schellenberg, 128 N.W. 279, 143 Wis. 647, 1910 Wisc. LEXIS 329 (Wis. 1910).
128 N.W. 279 (First National Bank of Racine v. Schellenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Akwa
206 N.W.2d 174 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1973)