First National Bank of Pompano Beach v. Mackey

330 So. 2d 39, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14091
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 2, 1976
DocketNos. 74-423, 74-425
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 330 So. 2d 39 (First National Bank of Pompano Beach v. Mackey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank of Pompano Beach v. Mackey, 330 So. 2d 39, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14091 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Two suits, each seeking a real estate commission arising out of the same transaction, were consolidated for non jury trial. Broker-Joseph C. Mackey & Company was awarded the commission and the several defendants in that case have appealed (our Case No. 74-423). The unsuccessful broker, Battle, Inc., Real Estate, has filed a separate appeal (our Case No. 74-425). The appeals were consolidated.

Only two points raised on the consolidated appeals have merit. The judgment in favor of Joseph C. Maokey & Company was against E. Charles Conway, Fairbanks Plaza, Inc., Gardens By The Sea Land Company and Gardens By The Sea Development Corp., jointly and severally. It was error to enter judgment against Gardens By The Sea Land Company and Gardens [40]*40By The Sea Development Corp. as there is no basis in the record upon which these two defendants are shown to be legally liable to Joseph C. Mackey & Company for commission on the transaction involving land beneficially owned by E. Charles Conway, title to which was held by Fairbanks Plaza, Inc. It was also error to omit, as part of the plaintiffs’ damages, interest on the debt from the date the same was due.

The judgment in Case No. 74-423 is reversed and the cause remanded for entry of a new judgment in favor of Joseph C. Mackey & Company consistent with the views herein expressed. The judgment in Case No. 74 — 425 is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WALDEN, C. J., and OWEN and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lerner v. Regency Homes, Inc.
745 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 So. 2d 39, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-pompano-beach-v-mackey-fladistctapp-1976.