First National Bank of Owatonna v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

First National Bank of Owatonna v. Anderson

262 N.W. 222, 195 Minn. 662, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 920

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided September 6, 1935·No. No. 30,626.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion of appellants to remand the cause to the district court is denied for the reason that the mortgage foreclosure sale made after the entry of the judgment appealed from cannot affect the validity of such judgment; and, furthermore, if appellants have a remedy under the moratorium act, they may apply to the district court for relief when an attempt is made to enforce the judgment against any real estate belonging to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion of appellants to remand the cause to the district court is denied for the reason that the mortgage foreclosure sale made after the entry of the judgment appealed from cannot affect the validity of such judgment; and, furthermore, if appellants have a remedy under the moratorium act, they may apply to the district court for relief when an attempt is made to enforce the judgment against any real estate belonging to them.

First National Bank of Owatonna v. Anderson, 262 N.W. 222, 195 Minn. 662, 1935 Minn. LEXIS 920 (Mich. 1935).

Pincite

262 N.W. 222 (First National Bank of Owatonna v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.