First National Bank of Olive v. Dolph

255 P. 187, 201 Cal. 767, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 521
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 6, 1927
DocketDocket No. L.A. 8518.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 P. 187 (First National Bank of Olive v. Dolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank of Olive v. Dolph, 255 P. 187, 201 Cal. 767, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 521 (Cal. 1927).

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] This is an appeal on the judgment-roll from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff on a promissory note. The facts are the same as those involved in The Anaheim National Bank v. Dolph,ante, p. 17 [255 P. 184], with the exception of the amount of the note. By stipulation this appeal was submitted for decision on the arguments and briefs in that case. On the authority of said case, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Philadelphia National Bank v. Buchman
171 A. 589 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 P. 187, 201 Cal. 767, 1927 Cal. LEXIS 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-olive-v-dolph-cal-1927.