First National Bank of Nutley, N. J. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

First National Bank of Nutley, N. J. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance

262 A.D. 794, 27 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5872

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 14, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 794 (First National Bank of Nutley, N. J. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank of Nutley, N. J. v. Commercial Casualty Insurance, 262 A.D. 794, 27 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5872 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

The trial of this cause and" the determination as to the ownership of a fund of about $20,000 in the hands of the State Comptroller have been delayed for years. A mistrial was granted because the attorney for appellant failed to keep his agreement following a request by the court to present some eighty-four exhibits to the attorneys for other parties for examination. It was the desire of the court that the exhibits should be offered en masse and objections taken in a like manner in order to expedite the trial. No adequate explanation for the failure is given. Costs were properly assessed against his client. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The trial of this cause and" the determination as to the ownership of a fund of about $20,000 in the hands of the State Comptroller have been delayed for years. A mistrial was granted because the attorney for appellant failed to keep his agreement following a request by the court to present some eighty-four exhibits to the attorneys for other parties for examination. It was the desire of the court that the exhibits should be offered en masse and objections taken in a like manner in order to expedite the trial. No adequate explanation for the failure is given. Costs were properly assessed against his client. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffeman, Schenck and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 794, 27 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-nutley-n-j-v-commercial-casualty-insurance-nyappdiv-1941.