First National Bank of Neenah v. W. J. Durham Lumber Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

First National Bank of Neenah v. W. J. Durham Lumber Co.

256 N.W. 783, 216 Wis. 66, 1934 Wisc. LEXIS 302

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 9, 1934

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 256 N.W. 783 (First National Bank of Neenah v. W. J. Durham Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank of Neenah v. W. J. Durham Lumber Co., 256 N.W. 783, 216 Wis. 66, 1934 Wisc. LEXIS 302 (Wis. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Rosenberry, C. J.

These cases were submitted on the 25th day of June, 1934. A motion for rehearing in Hanauer v. Republic Building Co., ante, p. 49, 255 N. W. 136, 256 N. W. 784, was then pending. We have considered these cases and the motion for rehearing in the Hanauer Case together. After full reconsideration, we adhere to the determination made in the Hanauer Case that sec. 269.58, Stats., is invalid because in conflict with the provisions of the constitution of the United States in the particulars set forth in the memorandum filed in the Hanauer Case, on motion for-rehearing, to which reference is hereby made. The section being unconstitutional, other questions raised need not be considered nor discussed. Our conclusion requires a reversal of the order appealed from.

By the Court. — The order appealed from in each case, is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to sustain the demurrer and for further proceedings according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenberry, C. J.

These cases were submitted on the 25th day of June, 1934. A motion for rehearing in Hanauer v. Republic Building Co., ante, p. 49, 255 N. W. 136, 256 N. W. 784, was then pending. We have considered these cases and the motion for rehearing in the Hanauer Case together. After full reconsideration, we adhere to the determination made in the Hanauer Case that sec. 269.58, Stats., is invalid because in conflict with the provisions of the constitution of the United States in the particulars set forth in the memorandum filed in the Hanauer Case, on motion for-rehearing, to which reference is hereby made. The section being unconstitutional, other questions raised need not be considered nor discussed. Our conclusion requires a reversal of the order appealed from.

By the Court. — The order appealed from in each case, is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to sustain the demurrer and for further proceedings according to law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 N.W. 783, 216 Wis. 66, 1934 Wisc. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-neenah-v-w-j-durham-lumber-co-wis-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack