First National Bank of Montgomery v. McLean

137 So. 911, 223 Ala. 699
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 15, 1931·No. 3 Div. 952.·Published

Opinion

ANDERSON, C. J.

This appeal is in the nature of a second application for a rehearing, as the law of this ease was settled in the former opinion, 221 Ala. 103, 127 So. 550, and in which an application for rehearing was considered and overruled.

We have again considered the former opinion, and do not care to recede therefrom, and this trial was in conformity therewith, and the jury found that the keeping and caring for the cattle, and turning the same over to the bank, did not amount to such a payment as to stop the running of the statute of limitations in favor of this appellee.

The case of Bank of Conway v. Sutherland, 51 N. D. 399, 200 N. W. 505, 37 A. L. R. 1186, in no wise conflicts with our former opinion. There the right of the indorser to plead the statute of limitations was not involved.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

THOMAS, BROWN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First National Bank of Montgomery v. McLean, 137 So. 911, 223 Ala. 699 (Ala. 1931).

137 So. 911 (First National Bank of Montgomery v. McLean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLean v. First Nat. Bank
127 So. 550 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Bank of Conway v. Stary
200 N.W. 505 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1924)