First National Bank of Miami v. Risolia

200 So. 2d 260, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1967·No. No. 67-154·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A review of appellee’s amended petition discloses that the relief sought concerns the construction of the terms and provisions of a will. In re Rogers’ Estate, Fla.App. 1965, 180 So.2d 167; King v. Citizens & Southern Nat. Bank of Atlanta, Ga., Fla.App.1958, 103 So.2d 689. The circuit court has jurisdiction to construe the provisions of a will so long as the will has first been probated and the circuit court was the court first obtaining jurisdiction for construction. Section 732.42 Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; In re Dahl’s Estate, Fla.App.1960, 125 So.2d 332, 335.

Therefore, no error has been shown in the order of the circuit court denying appellant’s motion to dismiss appellee’s amended petition and we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First National Bank of Miami v. Risolia, 200 So. 2d 260, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4967 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

200 So. 2d 260 (First National Bank of Miami v. Risolia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

WILLIAM GUNDLACH, III v. JON ERIK GUNDLACH
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022
ALFREDO TENDLER v. KENNETH N. JOHNSON
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021