First National Bank of Memphis v. Boyd

First Circuit

First National Bank of Memphis v. Boyd

249 F.2d 443

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 1957

Docket13094

StatusPublished

This text of 249 F.2d 443 (First National Bank of Memphis v. Boyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank of Memphis v. Boyd, 249 F.2d 443 (1st Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

249 F.2d 443

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MEMPHIS, a National Banking Association, Petitioner,
v.
Marion S. BOYD, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Respondent.

No. 13094.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

September 23, 1957.

Before ALLEN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been considered by the court upon the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, the respondent's response to the order to show cause why the writ should not issue, and the oral arguments and briefs of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the Writ should not issue for the reasons stated by the Court in its opinion filed this day,

It Is Ordered that the Writ of Mandamus herein sought against the respondent is denied and the petition seeking said writ is dismissed at Petitioner's cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

249 F.2d 443

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MEMPHIS, a National Banking Association, Petitioner,
v.
Marion S. BOYD, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, Respondent.

No. 13094.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

September 23, 1957.

Before ALLEN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been considered by the court upon the Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, the respondent's response to the order to show cause why the writ should not issue, and the oral arguments and briefs of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the Writ should not issue for the reasons stated by the Court in its opinion filed this day,

It Is Ordered that the Writ of Mandamus herein sought against the respondent is denied and the petition seeking said writ is dismissed at Petitioner's cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 F.2d 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-memphis-v-boyd-ca1-1957.