First National Bank of Louisville v. Fidelity America Mortgage Co. (In Re Fidelity America Mortgage Co.)
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
The evidentiary question before us is whether certain documents (copies of a letter and the return receipts from the mailing of that letter) are admissible over the objection of the defendants. We conclude that those documents are admissible because *623 they have been properly authenticated, they are material and relevant to the issues involved in this adversary proceeding and they are not objectionable as hearsay.
The parties, in this regard, have stipulated that (1) the documents in question are true and correct copies and are authentic, (2) testimony could be produced to the effect that the return receipts in question are those resulting from the mailing of the letter in question and (3) testimony could be produced to the effect that the return receipts evidence delivery of the letter to the persons whose signatures appear thereon. 2 Therefore, we conclude that those documents have been properly authenticated. Furthermore, they are material and relevant to the instant proceeding because they go to the issue of whether the interests of the defendants in the property, which is the subject of this proceeding, were terminated, under Kentucky law, by the sending of the above letter. Finally, because those documents are being offered, not for the truth of what is stated therein, but only to establish an operative fact — i. e., that notice of default was sent — they do not constitute hearsay within the meaning of Rule 801(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 3 We will, therefore, admit those documents into evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
15 B.R. 622 (First National Bank of Louisville v. Fidelity America Mortgage Co. (In Re Fidelity America Mortgage Co.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.