First National Bank of Leesburg v. Huey

Supreme Court of Florida

First National Bank of Leesburg v. Huey

5 So. 2d 689, 149 Fla. 306, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 767

DecidedJanuary 16, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 5 So. 2d 689 (First National Bank of Leesburg v. Huey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank of Leesburg v. Huey, 5 So. 2d 689, 149 Fla. 306, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 767 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This writ of error is to a final judgment in a common law action wherein E. C. Huey was awarded damages in the sum of $875 with interest being an amount claimed by him as a commission for selling a certain piece of real estate as per contract with the First National Bank of Leesburg.

Appellant has argued five questions but they all turn on the sufficiency of the evidence to show a contract *307 for the sale, the meeting of the minds of the parties hereto, and the fact of agency on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The jury and the trial judge found that the plaintiff made out a case and gave judgment accordingly. We have examined the evidence and fail to find reversible error so the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This writ of error is to a final judgment in a common law action wherein E. C. Huey was awarded damages in the sum of $875 with interest being an amount claimed by him as a commission for selling a certain piece of real estate as per contract with the First National Bank of Leesburg.

Appellant has argued five questions but they all turn on the sufficiency of the evidence to show a contract *307 for the sale, the meeting of the minds of the parties hereto, and the fact of agency on behalf of the plaintiff in error. The jury and the trial judge found that the plaintiff made out a case and gave judgment accordingly. We have examined the evidence and fail to find reversible error so the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 So. 2d 689, 149 Fla. 306, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-leesburg-v-huey-fla-1942.