First National Bank of Eureka v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

First National Bank of Eureka v. Davis

226 So. 2d 857, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5376

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 7, 1969

DocketNo. 69-63

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 So. 2d 857 (First National Bank of Eureka v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank of Eureka v. Davis, 226 So. 2d 857, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5376 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F.A.R., 32 F. S.A., the court dispenses with oral argument in this case.

Appellant was plaintiff in a replevin action and appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of defendant following a trial before the court. The trial proceedings were not transcribed nor is there a stipulated statement of facts presented to this court in lieu thereof. Since the only points raised on this appeal which are based upon proper assignments of error cannot be determined without appellate review of all the evidence which was before the trial court, the record is simply insufficient to permit appellate review of the final judgment. See City of South Bay v. Armstrong, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 21. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Rule 3.10(e), F.A.R., 32 F. S.A., the court dispenses with oral argument in this case.

Appellant was plaintiff in a replevin action and appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of defendant following a trial before the court. The trial proceedings were not transcribed nor is there a stipulated statement of facts presented to this court in lieu thereof. Since the only points raised on this appeal which are based upon proper assignments of error cannot be determined without appellate review of all the evidence which was before the trial court, the record is simply insufficient to permit appellate review of the final judgment. See City of South Bay v. Armstrong, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 21. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 So. 2d 857, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-eureka-v-davis-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack