First National Bank of Detroit v. Hollins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

First National Bank of Detroit v. Hollins

160 A.D. 907, 144 N.Y.S. 1115

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D. 907 (First National Bank of Detroit v. Hollins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank of Detroit v. Hollins, 160 A.D. 907, 144 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed as to defendant Govin, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants’ motion to strike out the second amended complaint denied, with ten dollars costs. The precise averment that the written part of the agreement alleged in paragraph 19 is contained in the two letters set forth, and that all else beyond the terms of the letters is oral, renders the complaint, as so amended, sufficiently definite and certain. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed as to defendant Govin, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants’ motion to strike out the second amended complaint denied, with ten dollars costs. The precise averment that the written part of the agreement alleged in paragraph 19 is contained in the two letters set forth, and that all else beyond the terms of the letters is oral, renders the complaint, as so amended, sufficiently definite and certain. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D. 907, 144 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-detroit-v-hollins-nyappdiv-1913.