First National Bank of Clearwater v. Nelson

267 So. 2d 65, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3355
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 26, 1972·No. No. 41713·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM..

By petition for writ of certiorari, we are requested to review a decision of the District Court of . Appeal, Second District, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this Court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record, we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First National Bank of Clearwater v. Nelson, 267 So. 2d 65, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3355 (Fla. 1972).

267 So. 2d 65 (First National Bank of Clearwater v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chaney v. State
267 So. 2d 65 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)