First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley
This text of 120 So. 323 (First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Writ of error in this cause is taken from a judgment against plaintiff in error in favor of defendant in error. The sole question presented here is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. The record has been examined and it is not made to appear *269 that the jury misinterpreted the weight of the evidence or that it was influenced by considerations outside the evidence. The question at issue was peculiarly within the province of the jury to determine. In such a situation the judgment below must be and is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 So. 323, 97 Fla. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-of-chipley-v-chipley-fla-1929.