First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley

Supreme Court of Florida

First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley

120 So. 323, 97 Fla. 268

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 22, 1929·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Writ of error in this cause is taken from a judgment against plaintiff in error in favor of defendant in error. The sole question presented here is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. The record has been examined and it is not made to appear *269 that the jury misinterpreted the weight of the evidence or that it was influenced by considerations outside the evidence. The question at issue was peculiarly within the province of the jury to determine. In such a situation the judgment below must be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell,. C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Writ of error in this cause is taken from a judgment against plaintiff in error in favor of defendant in error. The sole question presented here is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment. The record has been examined and it is not made to appear *269 that the jury misinterpreted the weight of the evidence or that it was influenced by considerations outside the evidence. The question at issue was peculiarly within the province of the jury to determine. In such a situation the judgment below must be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell,. C. J., and Whitfield, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley, 120 So. 323, 97 Fla. 268 (Fla. 1929).

Pincite

120 So. 323 (First National Bank of Chipley v. Chipley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.