First National Bank of Albia v. City Council of Albia

52 N.W. 333, 85 Iowa 736
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided May 23, 1892·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Kinne, J.

This cause is submitted on an abstract which does not show that an appeal was taken. We assume, where a case is submitted upon an abstract, that it shows the entire record, so far as it is material. The abstract should affirmatively show that an appeal has been taken. Code, section 3178; rule of court 98; Gleason v. Collett, 77 Iowa, 448; Schooley v. Globe Insurance Co., 76 Iowa, 78; Domelly v. Cedar County, 75 Iowa, 536; State v. Clossner, 84 Iowa, 401. The appeal is necessary to give this court jurisdiction, nor is it waived by the appearance of the parties to the merits of the case, without objection for the failure to take an appeal. Under such circumstances, we are required to dismiss the case. Talbort v. Noble, 75 Iowa, 165; Plummer v. People’s Nat. Bank, 74 Iowa, 731; Phillips v. Follet, 69 Iowa, 39; State v. Clossner, supra. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First National Bank of Albia v. City Council of Albia, 52 N.W. 333, 85 Iowa 736 (iowa 1892).

52 N.W. 333 (First National Bank of Albia v. City Council of Albia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farmers' & Traders' National Bank v. Hoffmann
61 N.W. 418 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)
Doerr ex rel. Rowan v. Southwestern Mutual Life Ass'n
92 Iowa 39 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1894)
Baer v. Merchants & Bankers' Insurance
53 N.W. 287 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)