First National Bank ex rel. Stanton v. Abner

8 D.C. 590
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 15, 1874
DocketNo. 6357
StatusPublished

This text of 8 D.C. 590 (First National Bank ex rel. Stanton v. Abner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First National Bank ex rel. Stanton v. Abner, 8 D.C. 590 (D.C. 1874).

Opinion

Cartter, Ch. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

We all think the motion is too late. It is more than three years since the entry of the judgment, and the defendant neglected at the proper time to procure a stay of proceedings.

If the plea in bankruptcy operated as a stay of proceedings and was not waived by the defendant, the judgment would be clearly erroneous. But the remedy for correcting that error would be by appeal or writ of error, and not, after waiting over three years, ask us to practically set the judgment aside on a motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 D.C. 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-ex-rel-stanton-v-abner-dc-1874.