First Nat. State Bk. of Nj v. Carlyle House

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

First Nat. State Bk. of Nj v. Carlyle House

258 A.2d 545, 107 N.J. Super. 389

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedNovember 17, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.2d 545 (First Nat. State Bk. of Nj v. Carlyle House) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Nat. State Bk. of Nj v. Carlyle House, 258 A.2d 545, 107 N.J. Super. 389 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

107 N.J. Super. 389 (1969) 258 A.2d 545

FIRST NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEW JERSEY, A CORPORATION ORGANIZED UNDER THE BANKING LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CARLYLE HOUSE, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND ACME PLASTERING CO., INC., ARCTIC CONTRACTING CORP. AND ESSEX IRON WORKS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 10, 1969. Decided November 17, 1969.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEWIS and MATTHEWS.

Mr. Seymour Margulies argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Levy, Lemken and Margulies, attorneys for Acme Plastering Co., Inc. and Arctic Contracting Corp.; Messrs. Cohn and Turk, attorneys for Essex Iron Works, Inc.; Mr. Margulies and Mr. Sanford Schneider, on the brief).

Mr. Bertram M. Light, Jr. argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Chancery Division judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Judge Mintz' well-considered opinion, 102 N.J. Super. 300.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI