First Nat. Life Ins. Co. of America v. Simpson

Alabama Court of Appeals

First Nat. Life Ins. Co. of America v. Simpson

140 So. 766, 25 Ala. App. 72, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 81

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 29, 1932

Docket8 Div. 466.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 So. 766 (First Nat. Life Ins. Co. of America v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Nat. Life Ins. Co. of America v. Simpson, 140 So. 766, 25 Ala. App. 72, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 81 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

While the bill of exceptions contains a statement at the close which states, “This was all the evidence in the case,” the bill on its face discloses the fact that there was other evidence in the case not so included, notably the insurance contract sued on. As to this, the bill of exceptions states that the policy was introduced in evidence, but no copy or an abstract thereof is set out. In the absence of the policy we must presume that its recitals were such as to sustain the action of the trial judge in giving the general charge as requested by the plaintiff. Murphree v. Farmers’ Sav. Bank, 16 Ala. App. 340, 77 So. 934; Broughton v. Broughton, 17 Ala. App. 255, 84 So. 635.

Defendant sought to introduce in evidence what purported to he the application on which the policy of insurance was issued, but no sufficient evidence of its execution by the insured was adduced. Non constat, the policy was issued without written application or representation. The policy is the contract between the parties, and by it both parties are bound. Brotherhood Ins. Co. v. Harris, 24 Ala. App. 395, 138 So. 292.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed,-

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

While the bill of exceptions contains a statement at the close which states, “This was all the evidence in the case,” the bill on its face discloses the fact that there was other evidence in the case not so included, notably the insurance contract sued on. As to this, the bill of exceptions states that the policy was introduced in evidence, but no copy or an abstract thereof is set out. In the absence of the policy we must presume that its recitals were such as to sustain the action of the trial judge in giving the general charge as requested by the plaintiff. Murphree v. Farmers’ Sav. Bank, 16 Ala. App. 340, 77 So. 934; Broughton v. Broughton, 17 Ala. App. 255, 84 So. 635.

Defendant sought to introduce in evidence what purported to he the application on which the policy of insurance was issued, but no sufficient evidence of its execution by the insured was adduced. Non constat, the policy was issued without written application or representation. The policy is the contract between the parties, and by it both parties are bound. Brotherhood Ins. Co. v. Harris, 24 Ala. App. 395, 138 So. 292.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed,-

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 So. 766, 25 Ala. App. 72, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nat-life-ins-co-of-america-v-simpson-alactapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack