First Nat. Bank v. Scott

New Mexico Supreme Court

First Nat. Bank v. Scott

163 P. 1084, 22 N.M. 411

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 1, 1917

DocketNo. 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 163 P. 1084 (First Nat. Bank v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Nat. Bank v. Scott, 163 P. 1084, 22 N.M. 411 (N.M. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT,

ROBERTS, J.

The appeal in this case involves the' same questions presented to this court by the case of Owen v. Terrell, 162 Pac. 171. Appellant obtained a judgment against appellee, who was the district attorney of the Fifth judicial district, this state, and thereafter instituted proceedings in garnishment, naming the state treasurer as garnishee, and sought to garnishee the salary due appellee from the state, as such district attorney, under the provisions of chapter 26, Laws of 1915. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and upon appellant’s election to stand upon its demurrer judgment was rendered for defendant. From such judgment this appeal is prosecuted. In the case referred to we held that chapter 26, Laws 1915, did not authorize the garnishment of the salary of a public official.

Following that case, the judgment herein must be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Hanna, C. J., and Parker, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT,

ROBERTS, J.

The appeal in this case involves the' same questions presented to this court by the case of Owen v. Terrell, 162 Pac. 171. Appellant obtained a judgment against appellee, who was the district attorney of the Fifth judicial district, this state, and thereafter instituted proceedings in garnishment, naming the state treasurer as garnishee, and sought to garnishee the salary due appellee from the state, as such district attorney, under the provisions of chapter 26, Laws of 1915. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint, and upon appellant’s election to stand upon its demurrer judgment was rendered for defendant. From such judgment this appeal is prosecuted. In the case referred to we held that chapter 26, Laws 1915, did not authorize the garnishment of the salary of a public official.

Following that case, the judgment herein must be affirmed; and it is so ordered.

Hanna, C. J., and Parker, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 P. 1084, 22 N.M. 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nat-bank-v-scott-nm-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack