First Nat. Bank v. Eaton

New York Supreme Court

First Nat. Bank v. Eaton

32 N.Y.S. 652

DecidedFebruary 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 32 N.Y.S. 652 (First Nat. Bank v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First Nat. Bank v. Eaton, 32 N.Y.S. 652 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDIN, P. J.

As the appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer to a part of defendants’ answer, and no appeal is taken from any interlocutory judgment, the appeal should be dismissed. Code, § 1349; Bank v. Lynch, 76 N. Y. 514; Sheffield v. Robinson (Sup.) 30 N. Y. Supp. 799; Lee v. Timken, Id., 800; Haffey v. Lynch, 68 Hun, 507, 23 N. Y. Supp. 59. The appeal should be dismissed. Appeal dismissed, without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDIN, P. J.

As the appeal is from an order sustaining the demurrer to a part of defendants’ answer, and no appeal is taken from any interlocutory judgment, the appeal should be dismissed. Code, § 1349; Bank v. Lynch, 76 N. Y. 514; Sheffield v. Robinson (Sup.) 30 N. Y. Supp. 799; Lee v. Timken, Id., 800; Haffey v. Lynch, 68 Hun, 507, 23 N. Y. Supp. 59. The appeal should be dismissed. Appeal dismissed, without costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 N.Y.S. 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nat-bank-v-eaton-nysupct-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack